TOP
Image Alt

Utah Business

High tension and several lawsuits surround the Utah Lake Restoration Project, leaving many to wonder how the fate of Utah Lake should be decided.

How should we decide the fate of Utah Lake?

When the Utah Lake Restoration Project announced its plans to build the world’s-largest artificial islands in the center of Utah Lake, the idea sparked backlash. There was a public petition asking for the project to be stopped, a letter signed by over 100 scientists outlining the potential harm of the project, and a rally at the state capitol building to encourage legislators to protect the lake.

The project has also led to a $3 million lawsuit, followed by a countersuit between the Utah Lake Restoration Project and Dr. Ben Abbott, a professor of ecosystem ecology who has been a key player in the fight against the creation of artificial islands.  Though the lawsuits have yet to reach a settlement, continued tension around the project has left many wondering how best to decide the fate of a major resource like Utah Lake. 

“Water is a life source we cannot live without,” says Mary Murdock Meyer, CEO of Timpanogos Nation. “[Utah] Lake [has] sustained our people for many generations. Water to drink, fish to eat, a place for ceremony and prayer. When the pioneers came, they used its abundance to help in their survival… This lake holds historic meaning to all of us.”

The question of control over this important shared resource will be a major topic of the current legislative session as legislators meet to discuss HB 232, a bill to shift control of Utah Lake to a centralized authority.  Currently, control of the lake is divided between various government entities and a potential shift of power would consolidate control over the future of Utah Lake to one group. 

Critics of the bill fear giving one group complete control over land use, environmental clean-up, and restoration decisions would cause decisions to be made without careful review, scientific input, and sufficient feedback from Utah residents, especially because there have already been problems with proposed restoration plans so far. 

Regarding the future of the lake, Dr. Abbott believes decisions are much too big to go forward without extensive discussion. “Depending on how you think of it, this is a 150 square mile decision,” he says in reference to the Utah Lake Restoration Project. “Or a 30,000-year decision, looking back to the Pleistocene origins of this lake that deposited this valley bottom.”

From the beginning of the Utah Lake Restoration Project proposal, Abbott has been very vocal over the long-lasting implications of every decision about the lake’s future and control over that future. He explains, “The way we respond to this crisis will influence how our valley grows and what our society grows into.”

Carol-Lyn Jardine, a member of Conserve Utah Valley, shared the same sentiment in an online post. “What is clear, however, is that any legislation significantly affecting a community resource like Utah Lake requires much more rigorous, engaged input and scrutiny than the current Utah Lake Authority proposal has received.” 

As we wait for the legislative session to wrap, the Provo City Council has presented a resolution calling for the protection of Utah Lake, citing concerns about the decision-making process concerning Utah Lake in the future. 

“We don’t normally find ourselves wanting to jump into every single potential issue that might be before the state legislature, but this is an issue that is such significance to the entire valley, the county, the businesses that depend on the lake, the water rights that depend on the lake,” says Provo City Council member, George Handley.

The leadership of the Utah Lake Restoration Project responded to concerns about the lack of public involvement in the planning process, saying they welcome public involvement and feedback for their plans. 

While legislators, private citizens, scientists, environmentalists, engineers, and developers bring different perspectives to the fate of Utah Lake, one thing remains clear; creative collaboration is the only way to truly come up with solutions that meet the needs of the community. 

Comments (4)

  • Mark M

    This idea of creating a series of islands in Utah Lake should never have gotten this far. It shows how out of touch our state leadership is, as well as government hypocrisy. We have the governor standing on the shores of the Great Salt Lake speaking of its importance to both our environment and economy, yet Utah’s largest fresh water lake is fair game to developers to do as they wish.

    These islands will be a generational disaster that will cost the state billions to fix, or as usual, the state will simply neglect it. Being one of the primary sources of water to the Great Salt Lake, the mismanagement of Utah Lake could eventually have drastic consequences to the Great Salt Lake, and the state government would have no one but themselves to blame.

    • Sj

      Do you have any data to support your claim that this would negatively impact the great salt lake? Do you have any data to support the idea that islands would be a generational disaster? Or that it would cost billions of taxpayer dollars?…. Don’t just make things up because you don’t like something.

      • Willie holdman

        https://pws.byu.edu/utahlakeislands
        Here is a start. I’m no scientist by any means, but you really don’t have to be to see what a harmful and terrible idea this is for so many stake holders (Mainly the everyday joe public who actually enjoy the lake for what it is) no, I’m not afraid to use my real name. Developing on open land is one thing, replacing ownership of public bodies of water with private parties wanting to profit by putting asphalt and cement in place of the lake is quite preposterous. #badidea

  • WJ

    The challenge we have with Utah Lake is its terrible quality of water.

    It has been a shallow body of water since its formation when Lake Bonneville ruptured. Compounding the problem is it has VERY little current. The tributaries that drain into the lake flow VERY slowly North through the Jordan River. Given the composition of the lake bed and organic growing within the lake, and our Summer temperatures, it’s ripe for the formation of the algae blooms that make it less than desirable as a water source and for recreation.

    I have NO vested interest in any of the proposed solutions. I’m not a developer, or a party interested in purchasing a residence on an island should that actually happen. I share that only to be transparent about MY intentions. I would LOVE to see Utah lake become a more accessible body of water. In my opinion, that means improving the quality of its water.

    Deeping the Jordan river to improve the flow of water through the lake could contribute to that outcome. Adding islands, while deepening the lake beds around them would also result in better flow through the lake. Creating channels through the lake bed engineered to enhance waterflow would help achieve this outcome.

    There are myriad solutions to this problem. Islands are simply one of them. Frankly, I’d love to see a causeway across the lake for better East West transportation. Simply uttering that will cause some in this forum to label me as a heretic. If we agree that improving water quality would serve the greater good, and that we’re willing to entertain all solutions to that end, then rancor and name calling isn’t necessary… or productive. The only other criteria would be that whatever solution we choose to support contribute to the visual aesthetic of an already visually stunning resource. Give our community supported an eyesore of a steal mill on the shores of this great lake for 53 years, we don’t a difficult standard to meet in order to achieve this outcome.

    I appreciate your collective passion about this topic. I welcome your thoughtful responses.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.